The ETO Sterilizer for Microbiology Research and Development is a new technology that is developed for sterilizing various microbiological samples in the research and development field. This type of sterilizer is made up of vaporized hydrogen peroxide, or VH2O2, and uses the concept of heat treatment to kill bacteria. It is used in both laboratory and clinical settings. In the laboratory, it is mainly used for the preparation of vaccines, but can also be applied in the development of pharmaceutical products. Similarly, in the clinical setting, it is primarily used to disinfect and sterilize surgical instruments.
What is Vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VH2O2) for Sterilization?
Vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VH2O2) is a sterilization method that is widely adopted in hospitals. This sterilization method, which is also used for decontamination of vehicles and buildings, can destroy all forms of microbial life. In addition to being a disinfectant, it is a powerful oxidant that has been documented for its antimicrobial effect and its ability to sterilize medical devices.
For a long time, H2O2 has been an effective sterilant, but it does have limitations. One of these is its lack of a consistent, linear microbial inactivation kinetic plot. Moreover, researchers have found that a spore monolayer on a BI surface is difficult to create.
To better understand the effects of VH2O2, several studies have been conducted. These studies have examined the effects of vaporized hydrogen peroxide on several materials.
One significant study assessed the use of VH2O2 to remove murine norovirus and feline calicivirus from cells. In another study, a bacterial endospore was examined. Moreover, the use of cellulose was examined in the sterilization process. It was found that cellulose can degrade VH2O2, which reduces the concentration of the chemical in the vapour phase.
What are Biological indicators?
One of the most reliable methods for assessing the efficacy of a sterilization process is to use biological indicators. Although there are several types of biological indicators available, the most reliable ones are the ones that are based on a direct measure of the loss of spore viability.
A biological indicator (BI) is a strip containing Bacillus atrophaeus spores or other suitable spores. These strips are then exposed to a selected sterilizing process. The results indicate the effectiveness of the sterilization process.
Biological indicators are designed to provide a rapid assessment of the effectiveness of the sterilization process. This will allow the user to work more efficiently and reliably. However, some of the indicators that are currently on the market require extended incubation periods. It also makes the monitoring process more time-consuming.
The present invention provides a novel method of assessing the effectiveness of a sterilization process. The method includes a system of measuring the rate of germination of a spore by contacting it with medium.
The system is faster and more accurate than other methods of determining the efficiency of a sterilization process. Furthermore, the auto-reader was more accurate than conventional culture-based methods.
Using a biological indicator to monitor a sterilization process is the optimum way to do it. However, the most important part of the procedure is obtaining a good BI. There are a number of factors that affect the accuracy of a BI. In order to make it effective, the BI should be tested on a daily basis, which is recommended by a regulatory institution.
Another method of determining the effectiveness of a sterilization process involves the use of linear reaction velocities (LRVs). A LRV is a numerical value indicating the expected survival rate of a microorganism.
Variability in Sterilization Efficacy
The rate of spore germination is directly correlated to the viability of spores after sterilization. This means that the rate of spore germination can be used to determine the effectiveness of a sterilization process.
Germination is an irreversible biochemical event. Spores germinate in response to amino acids. It is also important to note that the rate of germination is highly sensitive to the environment. For example, spores that are dried at 37deg C. will have a longer lag period before germination than spores that are dried at 55deg C.
The rate of spore germination can also be used to predict the number of viable surviving spores. There are three methods for estimating the number of surviving spores after sterilization.
Biological indicators (BIs) are commonly used to assess the microbiocidal efficacy of a sterilization cycle. Currently, BIs are based on enzyme assays. However, these indicators are only effective if viable spores survive per unit. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the number of BIs.
Another method for determining the sterilization efficacy of an ETO Sterilizer is the linear reaction velocities (LRV) approach. This method is derived from a linear ETO response curve. The LRV is proportional to the percentage of BI’s that exhibit a positive change in color.
The LRV approach allows for the assessment of the effectiveness of a sterilization process at very low levels. In particular, a sterility assurance level may be defined as the probability that one viable microorganism will survive after sterilization.
A sterility assurance level is achieved when the probability of a non-sterile unit is 10-6. This means that out of 100,000 sterilized units only one will be contaminated with a viable spore.
How to Validate an Ethylene Oxide (EO) Sterilization Process?
To validate an ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization process, the appropriateness of biological indicators must be demonstrated. There are three basic approaches to developing an ETO sterilization cycle.
In order to determine the correct type of BI, it’s necessary to first establish the intrinsic resistance level. This can be accomplished through comparative resistance testing. It is typically done in small chambers, where the rate of microbial growth is measured. If the BI is confirmed to have greater resistance than the product bioburden, then it is appropriate.
One type of comparative resistance test is the overkill method. This approach is relatively easy to perform. The goal is to determine how many of the resistant microorganism spores can be inactivated by the EO sterilization process. By applying various cycle parameters, the time required to achieve specific pressure set points is determined.
Another approach is to use a moist heat process. This is used when the EO sterilization process is not a good match for the product bioburden. With the moist heat method, a BI with lower resistance is used.
A third approach is to consider using a combination of BI and bioburden methods. This can reduce the cost of testing and allow for more effective processing. However, there are risks involved.
When using a risk-based approach, it is important to ensure that it is linked to product change control. It is also important to make sure the evaluations are conducted as frequently as possible. For example, if a product is expected to undergo significant changes in manufacturing processes, the frequency of evaluations of in situ resistance should be increased.
What are Standard resistances for EO Sterilization?
There are a variety of considerations that go into the process of sterilizing health care products. These include process definition, equipment, and characterization of the sterilizing agent. However, there are a few specific aspects that should be considered when establishing an appropriate EO sterilization standard.
The first is the challenge microorganism. This microorganism should be chosen carefully. The goal is to choose an organism that is likely to be isolated from spore forming contamination. Other important considerations are detection sensitivity, experimental design, false-positive results, and sample size.
Another consideration is the microbial bioburden. In addition to the resistance of the BI, the bioburden should be consistent with the microbiological state at the time of the EO sterilization cycle. If there are highly resistant microorganisms, this may impede the efficacy of the sterilization process.
The microbial bioburden may be defined as the total amount of microbial organisms that are present in a test sample. This number can be determined by assessing growth and trending data. When a representative number of samples is gathered, this can be used to estimate the risk of resistance to the sterilant.
The risk-based approach should be used to determine the frequency of future evaluations for in situ resistance. This method should also be linked to the product change control procedures.
During the validation of an EO sterilization process, the biological indicator (BI) is used to assess the inactivation of the microorganisms.
The Bottom Line
In healthcare facilities, ETO Sterilizer is used to sterilise heat- or moisture-sensitive critical objects (and occasionally semi critical items) that cannot be disinfected with steam sterilisation. Protein, DNA, and RNA alkylation is thought to be the cause of ETO’s microbicidal action. In cells, alkylation the substitution of an alkyl group for a hydrogen atom prevents regular cell functions and replication.